Know the instrument before you touch the ticker
Paste an exact mint and get its passport: who issued it, what a holder actually has a claim on, how redemption works and when each market is open — every material claim linked to the document it came from, with the date it was checked
Same name. Different instrument
Search “Tesla” on Solana and you get several tokens. Two are issued by different companies under different terms. One copies a name and symbol exactly — and is a different mint
Tesla xStock
- Issuer
- Backed Assets (JE) Limited
- Claim
- A claim against Backed Assets (JE) Limited under the certificate terms
- Redeem
- Onboarded eligible investors after KYC; not US persons
- Mint
- XsDoVf…sJHzoB
Tesla (Ondo Tokenized)
- Issuer
- Ondo Global Markets (BVI) Limited
- Claim
- Economic exposure via Ondo Global Markets (BVI) Limited
- Redeem
- Eligible non-US persons after onboarding
- Mint
- KeGv7b…67ondo
Tesla (Ondo Tokenized) — identical name & symbol in metadata
- Issuer
- No issuer document names this mint
- Claim
- Unknown
- Redeem
- Unknown
- Mint
- 5Epy…dWEX
We don't call it fake. We say there is no reviewed card for this address — and show the one that exists
No green badge that says “real stock”
Each passport is scored on four separate axes. A status always means exactly one thing
On-chain identity
Owner program, mint layout, decimals and metadata authority read at finalized commitment — and re-read live in your browser
Proves the account. Says nothing about rights
Issuer mapping
A chain-specific issuer document names this exact mint. Ticker, a third-party list or a website title is never enough
Without it, nothing is published as confirmed
Terms coverage
Category, claim type, votes, dividends, corporate actions, redemption, access. Missing means unknown — not “no restriction”
Disputed sources stay disputed, side by side
Source freshness
Allowlisted sources are fetched every hour and hashed. 48 h without a successful fetch and the source is marked stale
An unchanged hash updates checked-at, never reviewed-at
Every claim carries its receipt
Normalized value, scope (issuer, product or venue), the document and section it comes from, the digest we saw, when it was fetched and who reviewed it. Our own reading is labelled separately from the issuer's words
- 102 of 120 published claims carry a source; the rest are explicitly unknown
- Two editor accounts — nobody approves their own change
- Publish binds to the exact revision hash that was approved
What the holder has a claim onA claim against Backed Assets (JE) Limited under the certificate terms — not a shareholder position in Tesla, Inc.Sourcedissuer
Paraphrase: Certificates constitute direct, secured and unsubordinated obligations of the issuer.
Backing statementSource states the certificates are collateralised by the underlying held with a custodianSourcedissuer
Paraphrase: Obligations are secured by the underlying assets held by the custodian for the benefit of holders.
Redemption minimumNot stated in the reviewed documents for this productUnknownissuer
MSTRx · Dividends / distributionsUnder review after a Final Terms updateReview requiredproduct
Paraphrase: Section 7 was amended in the latest version; the new wording is awaiting review.
“Trades 24/7” is not “redeemable on Sunday”
The underlying market, the issuer's desk and the on-chain venue keep different hours. A passport shows them as separate rows — and shows a live status only where a verified calendar exists
When a document moves, so does the card
12 sources checked · 10 unchanged · 1 changed · 1 unreachable
Editor ed.marta drafted the new distributions wording; awaiting a second reviewer
No successful fetch for 48 h — values are not refreshed, last success is shown on each card
Normalized content hash changed in §7 Distributions
Previous value kept as history; no current confirmed value until a reviewer approves the new revision
Fee wording aligned with Final Terms §9
Show the passport where people trade
Versioned JSON with source IDs, claim statuses and coverage — unknowns included, never hidden. Admin notes never leave the review desk
$ curl <host>/v1/passports/solana/XsDoVf…sJHzoB
{
"schema": "assetbrief.passport/1",
"version": 3,
"coverage": { "issuer_mapping": "confirmed", … },
"claims": [{ "field": "voting", "status": "value", … }]
}API reference →Credits for integrators
Reading stays free. Wallets, terminals and research desks that embed passports or call the API at volume pay in $ABRIEF credits — keys, rate limits and update alerts when an instrument's terms change
Read before you read
Is a tokenized stock the same as owning the share?
Usually not. Most instruments on Solana today are issuer obligations or wrappers that track a price. A passport says which kind of claim a holder has, under which document — and when the documents don't say, it says unknown
Why isn't there a single “verified” badge?
Because “real stock” mixes four separate questions: is this the right account on-chain, does the issuer name this mint, how much of the terms are covered, and are the sources current. Each gets its own status, and none of them is an endorsement
What happens when an issuer changes a document?
The hourly checker hashes the normalized text. A material change flags the linked claims as review required immediately; the previous value stays visible as history and nothing is shown as current until a second reviewer approves the new revision
I pasted a mint and got “not in the catalog”. Is it a scam?
It only means there is no reviewed card for that exact address. AssetBrief never calls a token fake. If a curated instrument shares its name, we show that one next to it, with its own address
Does AssetBrief check reserves?
No. When an issuer states that tokens are backed, the passport quotes that statement and marks it as the issuer's. It is never turned into our own attestation
Do I need a wallet?
No. Reading passports, comparing and exporting are public. Nothing on the site asks for a signature